Hire Writer It is true that globalization is a humongous part of civilization but right now, it sin it as crucial as saving our planet. Revel In my extended essay, I will explain how globalization affects the environment and the Seibel solutions to protect the environment yet sustain the international trade. I will clarify why damaging the environment is an inevitable significance of globalization. This essay will include the influences of rising production; relocation of polluting industries; increased flow of goods, services and people.
Connect With Us Global Warming Global warming—also called climate change—refers to the worldwide rise in temperatures that has been blamed for severe weather in many parts of the world.
The Earth Policy Institute reported that was the hottest year on record with an average global temperature of The IPCC also predicts an increase in average temperature between 2. This rise in temperature is blamed for a number of environmental problems, such as an increase in the worldwide sea level by 11 to 17 inches 28 to 43 centimeters caused by melting ice glaciers that threatens to swamp coastal land areas and islands National Geographic, In it was estimated that devastation attributed global climate change had risen to 1.
The cause of global warming is human activity, including fossil fuel combustion associated with industrial development, the burning of forests by farmers in the developing world, and even biomass combustion—the burning of wood, coal, and dung for cooking and heat—by the poor.
Under the Protocol, developed, signatory nations are supposed to achieve a five to seven percent reduction from levels in CO2 emissions by to Developing nations do not have such specific targets, but are incentivized to reduce greenhouse gas emissions through voluntary targets, technology transfer, and the income generated by the cap-and-trade market designated in the protocol.
The Kyoto Protocol came into force in after signed the agreement. At least 55 countries that account for a total of 55 percent or more of greenhouse gas emissions at levels must ratify the protocol for it to take effect.
Most importantly, despite being one of the 84 drafters of the Protocol inthe United States has been an outspoken critic of the agreement since then, and as the producer of about one-third est.
The majority of the international community stays committed to pushing forward Globalisation and global warming this protocol and future environmental agreements in the hopes that the U. The United States and other countries, such as Australia, have voiced several concerns about the Kyoto Protocol, focusing on its scientific basis, economic cost, feasibility and fairness.
First, critics of the protocol question how serious global warming is. For example, the IPCC has never offered a specific figure for an acceptable concentration of greenhouse gases, and Thomas C.
In May atmospheric CO2 concentrations reached parts per million for the first time in several million years. At the beginning of the industrialization, concentration of CO2 was just ppm Carrington, Supporters of the protocol, on the other hand, say that the prospect of better scientific knowledge in the future should not prevent action in the present.
Second, there will undoubtedly be an economic cost to reducing greenhouse emissions. For example, closing down cheap coal-fired electricity plants and replacing them with cleaner but more expensive natural-gas burning plants would increase energy prices.
Likewise, forcing automobile manufacturers to produce more energy-efficient cars would be expensive. As a result, the economy as a whole would face slower growth and lost jobs, although the exact amount of such a reduction is subject to debate.
Furthermore, there is a cultural divide over how concerned we should be about environmental risk versus economic development. For instance, Europeans are generally more willing than Americans to pay high fuel taxes and drive small cars in order to protect the environment.
And, as previously mentioned, developing countries tend to prioritize economic growth over reducing their emissions. Third, critics say that the prescribed timeframe for emissions cuts is unreasonable and unrealistic.
For example, carbon dioxide emissions in the United States increased by 13 percent in the s, so that meeting the Kyoto targets for reduction from levels would require the United States to cut emissions by about 30 percent from the levels they would otherwise be projected to reach by Gallagher, In it was reported that the countries had collectively exceeded their target for reducing carbon emissions.
In total the level of carbon emissions was 14 percent lower than their levels, with the target being a four percent reduction. Despite this the U. For example, according to the U.
|Report Abuse||Comments As global warming negotiations move from Bali towards a worldwide treaty, it is important to address how global warming and global trade work hand-in-hand. Globalization is to global warming what warm water in the Gulf of Mexico waters was to Hurricane Katrina.|
|Globalization Is Fueling Global Warming | Alternet||Revell In my extended essay, I will explain how globalisation affects the environment and the possible solutions to protect the environment yet sustain the international trade.|
Thus, economic growth produced extra pollution, but the economy as a whole was in fact becoming cleaner and more efficient EPA, While the UNFCCC provides a general mandate for all countries to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, the specific commitments entailed in the Kyoto Protocol apply only to a group of rich countries on the basis that rich countries are best economically positioned to adopt environmental protection measures Kyoto, On the other hand, it is relatively easier for poor nations to upgrade outdated, dirty industrial processes by applying modern technology already available in wealthy countries.
Developing nations, however, argue that it is unfair to burden their current economic development with environmental regulations while the richer countries enjoyed unfettered development in decades past without environmental restrictions McGregor, These differences between the United States and many other countries have delayed implementation of the Kyoto Protocol, but most of the international community seems determined to press ahead.
Sincethe European Union, Japan, and Russia have ratified the Protocol, meeting the 55 percent threshold of global emissions and put the protocol into effect.
As of Mayparties have ratified or acceded to the Kyoto Protocol. Nevertheless, the disputes over the balance between economic development and environmental protection and between the responsibilities of rich and poor countries will have to be settled before an internationally coordinated strategy on reducing greenhouses gases can gain the participation of the United States.
A new direction for U. In his second inaugural address the President reaffirmed his commitment to sustainable energy and tackling climate change. This came off the heels of the devastation wrought by Superstorm Sandy in October of Governments have agreed to try to reach a deal on a binding UN pact to deal with climate change, going into effect in to replace the expired Kyoto Protocol.
However, the ability of President Obama to act on reduce carbon emissions is limited by a divided Congress and how much can be achieved in his last term remains to be seen Doyle, Global warming is one of many consequences of the “Poisoning of the Planet" by our failure to invent and develop a response by to the 90, man made chemicals pollutants we've inadvertently been dumping into our environment.
Feature/ Globalisation and global warming threaten Inuit food security Indigenous peoples face twin challenges to their food security: global warming and globalisation. Old ways are threatened. New foods are often unhealthier. No, globalization does not cause global warming any more than other human activities.
Odds are that globalization will lower the total CO2 in the long run. As standards of living around the world go up, people will use more energy-efficient fuels, which produce more . As global warming negotiations move from Bali towards a worldwide treaty, it is important to address how global warming and global trade work hand-in-hand.
Globalization is to global warming what. Short answer: It would seem so, but not really Long answer: It is useful to ask oneself if climate change would have happened in the absence of globalization.
It is higly likely that carbon-based sources of energy would have been the lifesource of. Globalization and the Environment; Global warming In it was estimated that devastation attributed global climate change had risen to percent of global GDP, after Superstorm Sandy in October It is forecast that the most hard hit economy will be China, facing $ trillion in the next twenty years (Sharma, ).